Consortium PSYCHIATRICUMConsortium PSYCHIATRICUMConsortium PSYCHIATRICUM2712-76722713-2919Eco-Vector1562710.17816/CP15627COMMENTARYКОММЕНТАРИЙMiscellaneousComments on the article “Dialogical structure of the brain and the ternary system of the mind: the neurosemiotics of Yuri Lotman”Комментарий к статье «Диалогическая структура мозга и троичная система психики: нейросемиотика Юрия Лотмана»https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7702-6343AndriushchenkoAlisa V.АндрющенкоАлиса Владимировна
Russian Federation

MD, Dr. Sci (Med.), Head of the Department of Mental Disorders in Neurodegenerative Brain Diseases, Professor, Department of Mental Health and Clinical Psychiatry, Faculty of Psychology

alissia.va@mail.ruMental-health Clinic No. 1 named after N.A. AlexeevГБУЗ «Психиатрическая клиническая больница № 1 им. Н.А. Алексеева Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы»Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityФГБОУ ВО «Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова»25032025010420256155600502202518032025Copyright ©; 2025, Andriushchenko A.V.Copyright ©; 2025, Андрющенко А.2025Andriushchenko A.V.Андрющенко А.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://consortium-psy.com/jour/article/view/15627

Sanna M. Dialogical Structure of the Brain and the Ternary System of the Mind: The Neurosemiotics of Yuri Lotman. Consortium PSYCHIATRICUM. 2025;6(1):CP15606. doi: 10.17816/CP15606Kostina AV. [Main features of postnonclassical science and philosophy. Materials for the courses “Philosophy”, “Theory and Methodology of Culture”]. Uchenyj sovet. 2019;(12):52–59. Russian.Luria AR. [Higher cortical functions of man]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter; 2020. p. 528–601. Russian.Lotman YM. [Articles on semiotics and topology of culture]. In: Yu. Lotman YM. Izbrannye stat’i: v 3 tomah. Tallinn: Alexandra; 1992. Vol. I. Russian.Lotman M. Umwelt and semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies. 2002;30(1):33–40. doi: 10.12697/SSS.2002.30.1.03Lotman YM. From the editors. To the problem of spatial semiotics // Works on sign systems. Tartu, 1986. Vyp. 720. С. 3. Russian.Anokhin KV. The Cognitome: Seeking the Fundamental Neuroscience of a Theory of Consciousness. Neurosci Behav Physi. 2021; 51:915–937. doi: 10.1007/s11055-021-01149-4Anokhin KV. [Cognitome: hypernetwork model of the brain]. In: Trofimov AG, editor. Nejroinformatika-2015: XVII Vserossijskaja nauchno-tehnicheskaja konferencija s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem: sbornik nauchnyh trudov: [v 3 ch.]. Moscow: MIFI; 2015. p. 14–15. Russian.Chalmers DJ. The conscious mind: in search of a fun damental theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. 432 p.Chalmers DJ. The character of consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. 596 p.Shvyrkov VB. [Introduction to Objective Psychology. Neural bases of psyche: selected works]. Moscow: Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk; 2006. 592 p. Russian.Handy ТC, Gazzaniga MS, Ivry RB. Cortical and subcortical contributions to the representation of temporal information. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(11):1461–1473. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00093-9Eckstein K, Friederici AD. It’s early: event-related potential evidence for initial interaction of syntax and prosody in speech comprehension. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;18(10):1696–1711. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1696Friederici AD, von Cramon DY, Kotz SA. Role of the corpus callosum in speech comprehension: interfacing syntax and prosody. Neuron. 2007;53(1):135–145. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.020Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Herve, P. Y., et al. (2006). Metaanalyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage, 30(4), 1414–1432.Anikina VG. [Ideas of M.K. Mamardashvili and cultural and dialogical understanding of reflexion]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 14, Psihologija. 2015;(4):114–122. Russian.Mamardashvili MK. [How I understand philosophy]. Moscow: Progress; 1990. 241 p. Russian.Mamardashvili MK. [Lectures on ancient philosophy]. Saint-Petersburg: Azbuka; 2018. 300 p. Russian.Vygotsky LS. [Thinking and speech]. In: Vygotsky LS. Sobranie sochinenij: v 6-ti tomah. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1982. Vol. 2. p. 5–361. Russian.Zaidel E, Kasher A, Soroker N, [et al.] Hemispheric contributions to pragmatics. Brain Cogn. 2000;43(1–3):438–443.