Connection of suicidal behavior with COVID-19 (clinical cases)



Cite item

Abstract

The widespread spread of coronavirus infection has led to significant changes in people's lives. Prolonged isolation, fear of infection, frustration, boredom, all kinds of deficits, inadequate information, money losses and fear of stigmatization, as well as the disease itself - all these factors have had an impact on the emotional and physical well-being of people. The impact of the viral infection itself on the human body, as well as the perception of a new reality, in some cases, led to the formation of reactive, organic or exacerbation of existing chronic mental disorders. Persons with mental health problems are most susceptible to environmental influences and react acutely to rapidly changing circumstances. Often in critical situations, in a state of despair, patients see only one way to solve all problems – voluntary retirement. In this article, we present clinical cases that are descriptive in nature and aimed at illustrating depressive experiences and suicidal behavior of patients in a crisis situation. When external circumstances were the reason for suicide attempts: loneliness as a result of restrictive measures, fear of infection or the disease itself, and the reason was a mental disorder that debuted earlier or re–emerged as a result of a viral infection. We have presented three clinical cases. All patients suffered from a new coronavirus infection of varying severity and were treated in a psychiatric hospital, where they were transferred from an infectious diseases hospital or hospitalized directly in connection with suicidal actions. In each case, attention was paid to the organizational activities carried out. The described cases may be of interest to specialists not only of a psychiatric profile, but also doctors of other specialties who are part of multifunctional teams to assist patients with COVID-19.

Full Text

Introduction

WHO officially announced the COVID-19 pandemic on March 11, 2020. Due to the need to prevent the spread of the disease in all countries of the world, appropriate restrictive measures have been taken. In Russia, from March 30, 2020, a non-working day regime was announced. It was assumed that the complete isolation would last no more than a week, but the restrictions were not lifted until May 11. From the point of view of reducing the spread of COVID-19, isolation was justified, but the measures taken affected the country’s economy and the well-being of citizens, as well as their mental health. This is how the quarantine period is described in the literature: prolonged isolation, fear of infection, frustration, boredom, inadequate information, money losses, fear of stigmatization, and most importantly fear for your life and the lives of loved ones1,2. All of the above was a favorable ground for the development of new and aggravation of existing mental disorders. Since the beginning of the pandemic and after, a large number of studies have appeared concerning the impact of COVID-19 on mental health. There are two poles in modern literature: some authors report an increase in requests for psychiatric help, others — a sharp decline in the period of self-isolation3–5. When comparing the lockdown period and the one following it, we can say that the lowest rates of requests for psychiatric help fell on the months during which more stringent social distancing measures were applied6. So, when compared with similar periods in 2019, during the lockdown period, the number of requests decreased by 37.5%, and after it — by 17.9%7.

The volume of inpatient psychiatric care also decreased during the period of strict restrictive measures7. According to the analytical data of the Federal State Statistics Service of Russia, the number of visits to dispensaries and outpatient psychiatric care offices decreased in 20208.

Thus, during the period of self-isolation, the appeal for psychiatric help decreased due to the fear of people leaving home. However, the decrease in the number of requests does not mean that help was not needed. Most authors agree that the current situation led to the development of certain mental disorders, among which asthenic, anxiety and depressive disorders were in the first place. Such symptoms are both a consequence of the impact of a viral infection on the body, and a person’s reaction to the disease9. In contrast to 2019, in 2020, the most common reasons for urgent psychiatric consultations were aggressive behavior and adjustment disorders with anxiety and depressive mood10. In a study based on Emergency hospital admissions, it was found that suicidal tendencies were more often detected in patients suffering from substance use disorders than in patients with affective disorders; delusions of persecution were more often observed in patients with schizophrenia, hallucinatory experiences were less common3. Another identified feature was an increase in the frequency of neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders in men who had not previously consulted psychiatrists3. Patients with personality/behavior disorders more often than others pointed to the connection between psychological well-being and COVID-19, and the reasons for their problems were called changes resulting from a lockdown in the medical care system3. According to domestic data, the growth of depressive symptoms is caused by various fears and is mediated by non-constructive ways of coping with stress11. Suicidal mood is associated with a high level of stress, and for the development of thoughts about suicide, it is not necessary to have a real threat, it is enough to have fear of the possibility of infection, fear of dying from an incurable disease or losing your relatives for this reason11. Many authors, both in our country and abroad, have pointed to an increase in suicidal mood in general12. However, according to international studies, there was no increase in the number of completed suicides13.

In the literature, suicides committed in unusual ways, for delusional reasons or group ones are more often described14,15. The presented cases, being common, demonstrate the dynamics of suicidal behavior, the reason for which was external circumstances: restrictive measures, the threat of infection or the disease itself, and the reason — a mental disorder that debuted earlier or during the quarantine period. Special attention in the discussions was given to organizational measures that were taken during the provision of medical care to patients. Clinical cases are arranged in chronological order. In the first, we are talking about the period of the third wave of coronavirus infection, in the second - the fourth and in the third - the fifth.

Case 1.

A 35-year-old patient was hospitalized in an infectious hospital with incised wounds on both forearms, which he inflicted on himself for suicidal purposes. At the time of self-injury, he was on outpatient treatment with a diagnosis of COVID-19.

Anamnestic information: He has not applied to psychiatrists before, heredity is not burdened with mental illnesses, he grew up and developed without peculiarities, attended kindergarten, went to school on time, graduated from 11th grade, studied “good” and “excellent”. Higher education, engineer. After training, he worked as a middle manager. Married for 7 years, has a preschooler son. He considers himself ill for about three months, when, against the background of his wife’s “infidelity”, depression of mood, motor inhibition appeared. It became hard to work, he was sluggish in the morning, couldn’t do anything, locked himself in. He continued to work, but at work he lost his initiative, made mistakes and miscalculations. At home, the relationship did not work out. The condition worsened against the background of self-isolation, when he was forced to stay at home all the time with his family (wife and son). There was irritability, anxiety for himself and for his future. After one of the colleagues fell ill with COVID-19, the patient was tested, which showed a positive result. Against the background of a slight deterioration of the somatic condition (loss of sense of smell, general slight malaise and weakness), anxiety began to increase. Then there were thoughts that “everything will end soon”, he began to consider himself doomed. The “last straw” was the suspicion that the wife did not break off the relationship “on the side”. After that, the patient realized that no one needed him and there was no point in fighting because “there is no way out anyway, because he is already sick”, “decided not to wait”. He inflicted incised wounds on his forearms and “went to die in the bathroom”, turned on the water so that “no one would hear anything”. The ambulance was called by his wife, who went into the bathroom.

In the infectious diseases hospital, which was previously a multidisciplinary hospital (changed its profile during the pandemic), the patient received surgical assistance in the form of suturing wounds. After examination by a psychiatrist at the infectious diseases hospital, the patient was transferred to a psychiatric hospital with a department for the treatment of patients with a new coronavirus infection with the diagnosis: “Mixed anxiety and depressive reaction due to adaptation disorder. Anxiety-depressive syndrome. F43.25 Suicide attempt”. Related: “Coronavirus infection, COVID-19, virus identified”.

Indications for the transfer were persistent suicidal tendencies, low mood, lack of plans for the future, as well as the lack of prospects (from the patient’s point of view) of continuing life, since he considered himself terminally ill. In addition, the patient expressed thoughts that “he will die in agony from lack of air, and this is very scary”. Having assessed all possible risks and predicting a possible unfavorable outcome for the patient, the psychiatrist made the only decision in this situation to transfer to a psychiatric hospital (the patient agreed with such a decision). Further management of the patient on an outpatient basis was not possible due to his suicide risk, as well as the self-isolation regime, which prevented both the patient from visiting psychiatric and psychotherapeutic services at the place of residence, as well as active dispensary monitoring of the patient at home.

Against the background of treatment of coronavirus infection in a psychiatric hospital, the patient was assisted according to the protocol of management of a patient with neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (F40, F41, F43, F44, F45, F48).

Case 2.

A 78-year-old patient was hospitalized in an infectious hospital for the treatment of a new severe coronavirus infection. At the time of hospitalization, the condition was of moderate severity, temperature 38.2 °C, breathing difficulties, heart rate — 90 per minute, BH — 20. According to the results of the computed tomography the lung lesion area was 20% (CT-1 picture)16. According to anamnestic data, she has been suffering from hypertension for a long time, type 2 diabetes mellitus. She has not taken antihypertensive therapy for a long time. Lived alone. Until the moment of hospitalization, she served herself completely. She went to the store, pharmacy, and walked on my own. Previously, she had not applied for psychiatric and psychotherapeutic help. She was hospitalized at the insistence of a local general practitioner due to the severe course of COVID-19. She behaved calmly at the department. On the 14th day from the start of inpatient treatment, she turned to the attending physician with complaints of pronounced weakness, decreased mood, anxiety, sleep disorders (difficulty falling asleep, frequent awakenings). On this occasion, she was consulted by a psychotherapist. During the examination, she said: “I thought when I was lying awake at night that I would die. It got better in the morning, so I decided that I would live some more”. At the time of the examination, she was emotionally labile, but she did not detect suicidal tendencies or psychoproductive symptoms. The diagnosis was made: “Organic asthenic disorder, F06.6”. Against the background of therapy correction, the condition with positive dynamics, sleep stabilized, appetite appeared, became more active, mood improved.

The condition began to worsen again in the fourth week. Shortness of breath grew, chest pains appeared, complained of lack of air, became anxious, fussy. It was further examined, according to the results of computed tomography, the degree of changes was critical (CT-4)16. After the appearance of the above symptoms, on the 22nd day from the start of hospitalization in the evening, the patient with a suicidal purpose inflicted cuts on her neck, and told the doctor that she “did not want to live anymore”. She was transferred to the intensive care unit for further treatment and observation, a psychiatrist on duty was called. On examination: she was conscious, oriented correctly in her own personality. She correctly indicated the current year and month, she made a mistake in the date. She understood that she was in the hospital, in the intensive care unit. The mood background was lowered. She entered into a conversation reluctantly, answered questions in monosyllables, easily irritated, angry. She said “two days ago I had already told my daughter on the phone not to be offended at me if I did something bad to myself”. She called her state of health the reasons for the suicidal attempt, said: “It doesn’t get any better, everything hurts! I could walk before, I lived alone, I did everything myself, and here! I can’t even get up without shortness of breath! They can’t find the cause of my pain in my stomach and chest! And they don’t wont to let me go home! I decided that at least I would leave!”. She did not express delusional ideas, she did not detect deceptions of perception in her behaviour. She was quickly exhausted, kept her attention with difficulty, easily distracted from the conversation. Her thinking was concrete, rigid, and she was extremely fixated on her well-being. Without gross intellectual and mnestic decline. Without criticism of his condition and suicidal actions. The diagnosis was made: “Other specified mental disorders due to damage and dysfunction of the brain and physical illness F06.8. Suicide attempt”. Related: “Coronavirus infection, COVID-19, virus identified”.

The psychiatrist on duty decided to transfer the patient to a psychiatric hospital. Indications for translation, as in the first case, were persistent suicidal tendencies, low mood, lack of plans for the future. Despite this, the patient signed a consent for hospitalization in a psychiatric hospital, but was sure that “it would not help her”. She was passively submissive, reluctantly obeyed doctors’ orders. She received help according to the protocol of management of a patient with a diagnosis of “F06.8 Other specified mental disorders caused by damage and dysfunction of the brain or somatic disease”. However, the severe course of the new coronavirus infection, as well as the presence of concomitant pathology, led to a fatal outcome at 5 weeks from the start of inpatient treatment.

Case 3.

The patient is 34 years old. Previously, he did not come to the attention of psychiatrists, did not turn to narcologists for medical help. At the time of self-harm, he was quarantined due to a positive test for COVID-19. From anamnesis: grew up and developed without peculiarities, went to school on time, studied “well” and “satisfactorily”. Graduated from a technical college. He didn’t work in his specialty. Previously, he worked as a salesman, tried to be a private entrepreneur, at the time of the lockdown announcement, he worked as a warehouse manager, did not lose his job. Married, no children.

His mental state has worsened since the detection of COVID-19, and therefore he had to take a sick leave. The somatic condition did not suffer. Two days after the start of the forced sick leave, he began to complain of dissomnic disorders, anxiety appeared. Being at home, he constantly monitored the performance of the warehouse, found “flaws” in the work, felt guilty in front of colleagues for “wrong leadership”. He shared his concerns with his wife, who at first listened to the patient, then reacted to such conversations with irritation. According to the patient, on the third day of forced isolation, when his wife was in the next room, lying on the bed and hitting himself on the temple with a mug, “for the first time there was a desire to commit suicide”. He told his wife about it, she offered to see a doctor, but he refused medical help. Ten days later, in front of his wife, he tried to squeeze out his eyes, “so as not to suffer, he wanted to die”. His wife called an ambulance for psychiatric help. When examined by an ambulance doctor: the mood is lowered, suicidal intentions are confirmed. Delusions, deceptions of perception could not be identified. The emergency psychiatric doctor decided to hospitalize the patient in a psychiatric hospital with a department for the treatment of patients with a new coronavirus infection. Such a decision was justified in connection with the mental state of the patient, whose abandonment without specialized care could lead to a deterioration of the mental state.

Despite the absence of somatic symptoms, it was necessary to comply with epidemiological requirements. The patient was taken to a psychiatric hospital voluntarily. In the emergency department: conscious, orientation of all types is preserved. The mood background is lowered. The voice is quiet, the speech is slow. He said: “I stopped sleeping in the last few days, there are no thoughts in my head, I even knocked myself on the forehead to put my head in its place. I got my wife whining. I’m worried about my job, it wasn’t all good there anyway, and now I’m afraid they won’t be able to cope without me. Anxiety appeared, I didn’t want to live”. He speaks about suicidal thoughts more willingly, reports information in more detail: “Well, they just appeared. I even hit myself on the temple while lying down to commit suicide. I also squeezed out my eyes”. He found it difficult to answer questions about the reasons for choosing such methods, however, he said that both times “his wife was in the next room or nearby”. About the use of narcotic substances, he reports extremely reluctantly, with irritation, “there were some I don’t remember”, he tries to change the subject. Thinking is slow in pace. Intellectually-mnestically it seems to be reduced. He interprets proverbs literally, he cannot explain the figurative meaning: “It’s clear enough here, the forest is being cut down — chips are flying”. He confirmed his consent to treatment and hospitalization. He claimed that he understands “the stupidity of his actions”, but “I can’t do anything”. Diagnosis: “Non-psychotic depressive disorder due to a mixed disease, (perinatal, intoxication genesis), anxiety-depressive syndrome F 06.3”. Related: “Coronavirus infection, COVID-19, virus identified”.

In a psychiatric hospital, against the background of treatment of coronavirus infection, the patient was assisted according to the protocol of management of a patient with organic (affective) mood disorders, including symptomatic, mental disorders (F06.3; F06.4).

Discussion

According to the literature, self-isolation plays an important role in the formation of suicidal behaviour1–5,7, what can be traced in each of the presented cases. The presence of anxiety and sleep disorders accompany patients with COVID-19, and also often precede suicidal actions4-5,7,9, this was also reflected in all three patients.

In all the cases presented, suicidal actions were preceded by fear of death from an “incurable” disease due to the lack of reliable information about COVID-19 and fear of stigmatization, which was also reported by other authors14,17. According to research, due to fear of stigmatization, patients often refuse specialized care, hide the fact of infection with a new coronavirus infection, and also mask their suicidal actions17. Patients with affective disorders are more likely than others to be suicidal3,5,17, and stress-related disorders during the pandemic were more common for men who had not previously sought psychiatric help3. Similar conclusions can also be made after analysing the described clinical cases (1, 3).

Many researchers emphasize the need to provide specialized care to patients after they commit a suicide attempt and the effectiveness of psychiatric intervention in the early post-suicide period to prevent repeated suicide attempts18–21. The doctors of the infectious diseases hospital and ambulance were guided by similar motives when transferring patients from a multidisciplinary hospital (cases 1, 2) and hospitalization directly to a psychiatric hospital (case 3). However, there is another point of view about the need to include a psychiatrist in a multifunctional team to assist patients with COVID-19 for timely intervention and prevention of mental disorders and their consequences in the form of suicidal attempts22,23.

Conclusion

In clinical example 1, it can be said that the disorder itself that occurred in the patient was not directly related to a coronavirus infection. However, the suicide attempt was provoked by the deterioration of the somatic state. Case 2 illustrates a situation when, against the background of long-term treatment for coronavirus infection, asthenic symptoms and deterioration of the somatic state, the patient decides to inflict life-threatening injuries (from her point of view, fatal) to stop the torment. Such actions are akin to auto-euthanasia, when a terminally ill person is no longer able to endure torment and helplessness takes his own life. For a patient (case 3) who had not previously suffered from mental disorders and had suffered a lockdown period and further restrictions, as it seemed, without tangible consequences. When directly infected with COVID-19, despite the mild course of the disease, he had pronounced mental disorders that led to self-harming actions. In each of the presented cases, anxiety and dissomnic disorders were present in the clinical picture, which were the first symptoms of incipient mental disorders. The surrounding picture of the world during the period when patients committed suicidal actions was characterized by a violation of the usual stereotype, a feeling of loneliness, uncertainty and the inevitability of death as a result of infection with a new coronavirus infection. The actions taken by doctors allowed to avoid serious consequences as a result of suicidal actions of patients.

×

About the authors

Galina Prokopovich

Northwestern State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Author for correspondence.
Email: galinapro1@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7909-6727
SPIN-code: 5985-3715
Scopus Author ID: 57203003009

Candidate of Medical Sciences, associate professor of Chair of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine

Russian Federation, 191015, Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg, Kirochnaya street, 41

References

  1. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet. 2020;395(10227):912-920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
  2. Gloster AT, Lamnisos D, Lubenko J, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health: An international study. Francis JM, ed. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0244809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244809
  3. Fasshauer JM, Bollmann A, Hohenstein S, et al. Emergency hospital admissions for psychiatric disorders in a German-wide hospital network during the COVID-19 outbreak. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021;56(8):1469-1475. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02091-z
  4. Szmulewicz AG, Benson NM, Hsu J, Hernán MA, Öngür D. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health outcomes in a cohort of early psychosis patients. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021;15(6):1799-1802. doi: 10.1111/eip.13113
  5. Håkansson A, Grudet C. Decreasing Psychiatric Emergency Visits, but Stable Addiction Emergency Visits, During COVID-19—A Time Series Analysis 10 Months Into the Pandemic. Front Psychiatry. 2021;0. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.664204
  6. Carrasco JP, Herraiz B, Sanchez LO, Luengo A, Fusalba OR, Aguilar EJ. COVID-19 lockdown influence in the psychiatric emergencies: Drastic reduction and increase in severe mental disorders. Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition). 2021;14(2):117-118. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsmen.2021.05.002
  7. Balestrieri M, Rucci P, Amendola D, et al. Emergency Psychiatric Consultations During and After the COVID-19 Lockdown in Italy. A Multicentre Study. Front Psychiatry. 2021;0. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.697058
  8. Federal State Statistics Service. Healthcare in Russia - 2021 г. Accessed March 24, 2022. https://gks.ru/bgd/regl/b21_34/Main.htm
  9. Prokopovich GA, Vladykina TV, Sivashova MS, Zueva ON. Experience of the psychiatric and psychotherapy services of an infectious hospital in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. V.M. Bekhterev review of psychiatry and medical psychology. 2021;(1):67-76. doi: 10.31363/2313-7053-2021-1-67-76
  10. Lorenzo RD, Frattini N, Dragone D, et al. Psychiatric Emergencies During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A 6-Month Observational Study. NDT. 2021;17:1763-1778. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S307128
  11. Medvedeva TI, Enikolopov SN, Boyko OM, Vorontsova OYu. The dynamics of depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia. Suicidology (Russia. 2020;11:3-16. doi: 10.32878/suiciderus.20-11-03(40)-3-16
  12. Banerjee D, Kosagisharaf JR, Sathyanarayana Rao TS. “The dual pandemic” of suicide and COVID-19: A biopsychosocial narrative of risks and prevention. Psychiatry Research. 2021;295:113577. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113577
  13. Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(5):416-427. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00084-5
  14. Golenkov AV, Orlov FV, Deomidov ES, Bulygina IE. Attempt of posthomicidal suicide of a patient with psychotic depression after having coronaviral infection (clinical case). Suicidology (Russia). 2021;12:137-148. doi: 10.32878/suiciderus.21-12-01(42)-137-148
  15. Griffiths MD, Mamun MA. COVID-19 suicidal behavior among couples and suicide pacts: Case study evidence from press reports. Psychiatry Research. 2020;289:113105. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113105
  16. Morozov SP, Protsenko DN, Smetanina SV, et al. Luchevaya Diagnostika Koronavirusnoi Bolezni (COVID-19): Organizatsiya, Metodologiya, Interpretatsiya Rezul'tatov: Metodicheskie Rekomendatsii. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. GBUZ «NPKTs DiT DZM»; 2021.
  17. Sørlie T, Sørgaard KW, Bogdanov A, Bratlid T, Rezvy G. Prevalence and characteristics of suicide attempters and ideators among acutely admitted psychiatric hospital patients in northwest Russia and northern Norway. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0545-3
  18. Grimholt T, Jacobsen D, Haavet O, et al. Structured follow-up by general practitioners after deliberate self-poisoning: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15(1). doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0635-2
  19. Jardon V, Debien C, Duhem S, Morgiève M, Ducrocq F, Vaiva G. Un exemple de système de veille post-hospitalière des suicidants : VigilanS. L’Encéphale. 2019;45:S13-S21. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2018.09.009
  20. Miller IW, Camargo CA, Arias SA, et al. Suicide Prevention in an Emergency Department Population: The ED-SAFE Study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(6):563. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0678
  21. Chung D, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Wang M, Swaraj S, Olfson M, Large M. Meta-analysis of suicide rates in the first week and the first month after psychiatric hospitalisation. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e023883. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023883
  22. Dalal PK, Roy D, Choudhary P, Kar SK, Tripathi A. Emerging mental health issues during the COVID-19 pandemic: An Indian perspective. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2020;62:S354. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_372_20
  23. Adorjan K, Pogarell O, Streb D, et al. Role of psychiatric hospitals during a pandemic: Introducing the Munich Psychiatric COVID-19 Pandemic Contingency Plan. BJPsych Open. 2021;7(2):e41. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.167

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.


Copyright (c) Prokopovich G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies